Archive for the ‘Graham Hancock’ Category
Overexposing The Unexplained
For a while now, I’ve been compiling thoughts for a lengthy post on how the thing I knew in the 1970s as The Unexplained — a popular genre, mainly in publishing, that encompassed the paranormal, including cryptozoology, UFOs and all points weird — has changed over the years from being a publishers’ category to operating as a alternative information market. For an illustrated glimpse at the popular cultural context of The Unexplained, see Absolute Elsewhere (where I lifted the title picture from).
I’m posting my brief notes on the subject now, having just read The Moss Grows Green On The Dark Side of The Moon: The Selling of The Paranormal In Popular Culture, the latest post on Intangible Materiality, which is sometimes brilliant, always engaging and never less than thought-provoking. I want to join in this discussion about where we’re heading with the paranormal.
Intangible Materiality says:
“Perhaps the popularization of the paranormal is in effect what keeps it safely ensconced away from prying eyes. The popular culture in effect is defining it’s paradigms through mass merchandising in a self referential feedback loop which, for the most part, may have nothing to do with what is being looked at.”
Here are my thoughts so far.
Unexplained mysteries are still with us: just direct your favourite browser and you’ll find more accounts on more sites than I can be bothered to list here. Despite the marketing techniques of popular publishers and the niching effect of the internet, the monolithic The Unexplained of the 1970s has remained, more or less, a single field of inquiry, albeit promoted under different names, embracing many specialist branches and lines of research and promoted by various interested groups and individuals. Unexplained discourses still work by writers repeating what others have asserted previously. Nevertheless, the mysterious world seems to have changed utterly.
Wandlebury
What happened to The Unexplained? Well, largely it’s become The Explained. Sometime between the late-70s and the early-90s, the form of The Unexplained dealing mainly with the paranormal was elbowed out of the way by combined theories of everything, the study of which evolved through repetition and was focused most successfully in popular culture through generic syntheses in the separate narratives of The X-Files, David Icke’s personal journey and Graham Hancock’s adventuring into para-archaeology. I stress these were not the first to try to combine previous versions of The Unexplained or the paranormal. George Hunt Williamson’s Secret Places of the Lion (1977[1958]) is a notable work of synthesis from the Golden Age of The Unexplained.
On the walls inside Royston Cave
Political conspiracy, once considered alongside other unexplained mysteries due to the enduring popularity of alternate narratives about various high-profile public killings, has become a separate genre. To a great extent, political conspiracy has overtaken the paranormal as the main site of interest. That wouldn’t have seemed possible in the 1970s, when it looked as though spirituality rather than materialism would be the new area of social contest.
The new conspiracy-led version of The Unexplained is a portmanteau para-investigative practice that seeks a unifying model to encompass recovered spiritualities, hidden histories and political conspiracies. As an anti-ideological mode, it supersedes both Left and Right, based on the obvious truth that interested, powerful individuals and organisations ultimately control policy through funding or withholding funds behind the scenes.
Conspiracy Theory, as popularised by The X-Files and reworked by David Icke, was a synthetic, even syncretic, mode of thought and practice that created the narrative space for a sparky combination of previously disparate strands of hidden or forgotten knowledge — the occult, spiritualism, time travel, political conspiracies, etc.
What we know as conspiracy theories are not theories so much as populist versions of rolling news narratives. These versions do not present the final sum total of hidden knowledge, despite what many marketing-aware self-publicists — whether New Age, free-thinking or otherwise disengaged from mainstream media — would have you believe.
Narrative amuck
At this point I should say that I regard David Icke, the most influential if not the most original free thinker among the recent conspiracists — certainly the genre’s most vocal and entertaining exponent— as an intellectual descendent of the likes of Charles Fourier, just off the top of my head, or better still, Menocchio, and as such a most useful macro-minded contributor to increasingly micro discussions about politics, identity and spirituality.
The populist one-stop-shop approach of the current milieu of The Unexplained, including conspiracism, encourages free thinking and research and it always encourages consumption — as was always the case with The Unexplained of yesteryear — as its proponents’ fall back on repetition to promote their ‘new’ products. When Icke took the mantle of Grand Unexplainer, the repetition that had always been present when yet another popular paperback on The Unexplained was published had finally been assimilated, in the Burrovian sense, and installed as a counter-traditional genre.
The twilight counter-traditions analysed by James Webb in The Occult Underground (1974) and The Occult Establishment (1976) were reanimated and deployed as anti-ideological activism to counter aspirational, materialist neo-liberalism in an age of conservative capitalist revolution. Feeding back into the loop of marketing and consumption, this stifling of multiple narrative strands, with their compression into an alternative true tradition, presents itself as a suppression and realisation of The Enlightenment — just like Situationism! — when it’s just playing it over again.
The churning narrative of political conspiracy is partly the mistrustful creative mind of the people at work. But public theorising is a part of the original conspiracy as much as it is a moral response or a series of personal awakenings or collective creative acts. Conspiracy is a self-regenerating counterintelligence forum. In working the theories, we are engaging in and possibly working — definitely perpetuating — multiple intelligence operations. While we’re counting bullets, planes, cameras, we’re continuing to make things worse not better.
Similarly, while we’re comparing UFO appearances with images all over the place, or comparing our chakra awakenings with those of others in various communities of feeling, we’re otherwise engaged and continuing to regard rather than heed experiences.
Crop oval, Herts., 1678
I’m all for counterknowledge — it’s particularly galling that I christened this new term for The Unexplained in my notebooks some years before someone as dull as Damian Thompson invented it and published a miserable book with that title — if it challenges the assumptions and common sense fallacies of ‘proper’ knowledge. As Doreen Massey says in For Space (2005), if societies foster too keenly knowledge hierarchies dominated by ‘hard’ science and intellectualism, they run the risk of making static “the lived or the intuitive”. We ignore the individualist dynamic of gut feeling at our collective peril.
The current version of The Unexplained presents itself as an immediate, responsive, discursive and reflexive mode of thought. That’s part of its attraction and a great part of its unattractiveness to those involved in promoting knowledge hierarchies.
In its self-imposed role as the Feeling Person’s Guide to Contemporary Confusion, in other territories, including medical science, physics and the status of individual perceptions of right, for instance, The Unexplained gets into an all-in bout with the publicity arms of corporatism and intellectual property and with the self-proclaimed anti-irrationalists.
Since they eschew the norms of science, whether ‘good’ or ‘bad’, and refuse to engage in the game of hierarchical intellectualism, the Unexplainers show clearly that a professional ‘Skeptic’, like James Randi or a proud religious rationalist like ‘Fucking’ Damian Thompson, for example, are simply reactive intellectual nonentities whose egos drive them to align themselves with the things they aspire to. Their thin voices rail against irrationality and they speak of aiding progress against the forces of regression. Presumably, they’ll claim responsibility for protecting human life and civilisation if the intellectual core of humanity does not implode before they die. (And what if it does?) In any case, they do nothing to promote intellectual progress, preferring instead to seek to stabilise convention for its own sake.
A brilliant magician
Such folk as Thompson and Randi are neither good nor bad scientists, because they do not produce testable hypotheses, nor are they effective researchers, because they don’t offer substantive original thoughts on what they’ve encountered. They ridicule their targets or the subjects of their discourse. They do not engage. They hate what they cannot become. It’s pleasing to think that, in this regard, they are products and producers of exactly the kind of quasi-intellectual repetition they deplore.
In this context, it’s clear that whatever we’re calling The Unexplained now stirs the self-righteous to anger. So there must be something to it.
That’s all she wrote.
21st century ghost hunting
The last word goes to Intangible Materiality on the progression of the paranormal from the quick buck hack-work of the pulp publishing era to the quick buck hack-work of the communication age:
“One cannot help but wonder […] how so many profound insights into the paranormal were wrested from oneself prior to the advent of global commercialization of what was once considered, a valued and at times, sacred quest as evidenced by a Siberian Shaman or for that matter, a John Dee.
[…]
Well we have evolved from tabloid coverage to infotainment without having gone anywhere at all.”
Posted by Neil
on February 27, 2008 at 10:47 pm
Tags: Consciousnesses, Counterculture, Graham Hancock, Individualism, The Unexplained
5 comments | Permalink
Unexplained Mysteries of The Unexplained
For a couple of years now I’ve been re-researching The Unexplained — lost civilisations, the paranormal, cryptozoology, alien technology, that sort of thing — a popular genre that I was a fan of in the mid to late 1970s. I’m putting together a post including some great book covers, but for now here’s something from Graham Hancock, the greatest modern exponent of The Unexplained. I proudly reprint in full the text of a letter from him that I wrote in reply to a communication I sent in late 2005:—
Dear Neil
Thank you for your letter.
Ever since man first started pondering the clear evidence of unexplained mysteries all around him, he has sought to explain them and leave the results of his research scattered all over the place for posterity to find. It is only relatively recently on man’s journey that he has stopped noticing the abudance of the self-explanatory unexplained under his own nose and has started to offer his own intricate expositions of unexplained evidence that either resort to science, thereby rendering the truth as no more than a series of so-called coincidences, or attach themselves to a conspiracy framework, within which unexplained mysteries become little more than the historical context for the fleeting concerns contemporaneous popular ‘radicalism’. Either way, the short-term findings of The Explained can hardly compare with The Unexplained, which is to do with the long term in deep time and space and is therefore more interesting and amazing.
I, too, suspect that the origins of Ancient East Anglia are to be found under the Antartic Ice, as are the origins of Civilization as we know it. Your prediction that giant man-made ritual stones will be revealed under Fenland, due to soil shrinkage, is very interesting. I’m not sure about your assertions on Ancient Drainage Techniques, although you may be on the right track in likening certain sites in the eastern counties to those I’ve described off Malta and, indeed, those amazing Olmec sites. Anyway, I await the uncovery of your hidden ritual stones with bated breath. Of course, our brave archaeologists will only have a very brief time to examine them before global warming floods most of these newly uncovered East Anglian sites of world importance. One wonders how much their closed academic minds will actually discover about these great monuments from deep time, before they’re covered once more by seas of our own making. Ironic, isn’t it that in the pursuit of knowledge and betterment, we’re about to add to the storehouse of man-made mysteries under the seas that first began with the great floods of 10,000 years ago?
Yes, it is a great shame that rising sea levels will make it virtually impossible to investigate the lost ancient cities located offshore of the coasts of all the major known continents. However, I predict that in years to come satellite imagery will penetrate the murky depths and afford a splendid view of what lies beneath, viz. loads of lost civilization sites, with roads, temples, walls and many other man-made structures, the existence and location of which are otherwise unexplainable by science. But how much will we care about ancient unexplained mysteries when so much of our contemporary world is being similarly lost due to rising sea levels?
On a different tack, why was it that humans only started religion, art, sophisticated symbolism and lateral thinking 50,000 years ago? How did humans suddenly work out that decorative patterns were pleasing, or that talking to each other was a good thing? In every part of the globe, all those many years ago, all the skills and qualities that we value most highly in ourselves today appeared suddenly, already fully formed, as though bestowed on us by hidden powers. Scientists describe this change as “the greatest riddle in human history”.
What is the significance of the astonishing similarities between the entities known as “aliens”, “ETs” or “greys” in modern popular culture, the entities known as “fairies”, “elves” and “goblins” in the Middle Ages, and the entities that shamans in surviving tribal cultures know as “ghosts”, “gods” and “spirits”? Why are such figures depicted in prehistoric art as far afield as Africa, Europe, the Americas and Australia? Why have eminent scientists at the cutting edge of consciousness research, especially those who study the ways that hallucinogens work in the brain, recently begun to question long-established theories about the nature of reality? Why are some now even ready to consider the possibility, long ago embraced by shamans, that, far from being false perceptions what we see in the strange imagery and experiences of hallucinations may be real perceptions of other dimensions and the beings inhabiting them? Why did Nobel Prize-winner Francis Crick keep concealed until his death the astonishing circumstances under which he first “saw” the double-helix structure of DNA? And why did he become convinced that natural laws are unable to explain the mysterious complexity of the DNA molecule itself?
Well, who knows? It’s not called The Unexplained for nothing!
Glad to hear you’re keeping The Unexplained alive! I’m off to the World Mystery Forum at Interlaken, on 4-5 November. Perhaps I’ll see you there! If not, all the best and keep buying the books. The truth will out, eventually, then you’ll see!
Kind Regards,
Posted by Neil
on September 12, 2007 at 1:15 pm
Tags: East Anglia, Graham Hancock, The Explained, The Unexplained
No comments yet | Permalink